Daisy Sewid-Smith - In her own words.

Adam Dyck and Daisy Sewid-Smith - Photo
by: Bert Crowfoot
On responsibility:
One of things we're encountering today is the re-visionaries.
Our own people are learning how to write, give interviews and
also they've learned how powerful the media is, every aspect
of the media. And they are doing re-visionary work of our history,
so that is something that anyone who is seeking true historical
facts of their culture must realize this. They must really try
and learn their own history. . .
On nobility:
One of the things I was taught... all the old people told me.
. . if you are of noble blood, you don't have to stand on top
of a rooftop and shout, 'Look I am a princess, look, I am a chief's
daughter, look, I am nobility. . .' you don't have to do it because
you're upbringing and training will show, and people will know
the minute they meet you, they will know what your training and
what your rank is by the way you treat them. And nobility was
always taught to be kind, even to strangers.
On approval:
Hmmm. . . our silence, which is something that again the untrained
or the young people will not understand today, that disapproval
in our custom and our tradition is to be silent. If you want
to do something, and everybody's silent, or if you said something
and what you said was not good, everybody would be silent. And
if you know the traditions and customs, you would know that means
disapproval. They did not like what you said. But if you said
something that was good and correct and done something well,
they'll let you know. They'll say, 'That is wonderful. I am so
glad you said that, or I'm so glad you did that.' You will hear
that. But silence has now been interpreted as the European silence,
of approval. And that's what the untrained and young people now
are thinking that that's what [silence] means, but it means the
opposite among our people. And it's surprising that trained people.
. . [we] can talk to each other just by facial expressions and
our eyes or in our hands, without saying a word. It'll be just
a mannerism, body language. . . And you see a lot of that when
a person or untrained person says something that's so untraditional
or not part of the custom. And you'll see a lot of the old people
doing that. And their silence doesn't mean they approve, it means
they disapprove. Otherwise they would have verbally told you
they approve. So that's what misconceptions that are out there.
On women:
Ah, women. . . (laughing). And women find it strange for me to
speak about women like this. Many of our women have completely
broken protocol, taboo, custom, tradition. They will, like I
said to you before I am uncomfortable speaking [before the chiefs],
because that's the way we were trained. I was at my father's
home when he used to call all the chiefs. . . what I call real
chiefs in earlier times. . . I was just little girl when I used
to help serve them. But I used to like to take my time because
I wanted to listen to what they had to say. Because women weren't,
not all women were allowed to attend these meetings. Only certain
women. And they had to either have a potlatch position or they
were very high ranking chiefs' wives. And even the women never
spoke in those meetings unless they were asked to by the chiefs.
And then, if a chief is speaking, a woman never interferes.
If I'm talking with you and if a [chief] all of a sudden had
something to say he will say something even before I am finished
speaking and I have to stop speaking when he does this, because
that's the way of our tradition or custom. . . that he must be
heard.
And many people, many women again, they have meetings before
potlatch and only a handful of people are supposed to attend
this potlatch. And only knowledgeable women are allowed to attend
these potlatches.
Now you have very aggressive women barging in and saying, 'This
is my right. I have a right to be here,' and completely monopolize
the meeting, shutting out the voices of the chiefs, and they
do that in the big house, and they start to. . . the decision
is no longer made by the chiefs, it's made by the women.
In the early days I used to hear the old chiefs say, 'How dare
so-and-so get up and speak at the potlatch last night. Doesn't
she know that she is not allowed to speak?' And that's in the
big house during a potlatch. And I heard this. . . and today
they completely monopolize everything. They make the decisions.
They decide how things are going to happen. . . I know what has
to happen at the big house, but never once do I sit down when
my brother is going to have a potlatch [and say] this is what
is going to happen, this is what we're going to do and you guys
have to do it because I say so. Never have I done that. I will
say, 'What are we going to do? What dances are we going to show?'
. . .even though I may have more knowledge than my brother, he
must have a voice. . . and then we all decide as a family what
will be shown and what will be said and what will be given and
how we're doing to do it. But in many cases [today] the women
have complete control, and control everything. And the old chiefs
call that a shameful act and I've heard it over and over as I
was growing up.
On respect:
I even had one feminist ask me did I not feel bad that the men
controlled our traditions and culture. And I said, No, because
there is a time that they will help support me. There is a time
they will honor me. When it's their time, not your time. . .
and you receive respect from men. But an aggressive, belligerent
woman will never get that respect. Oh, they might get their way,
but they will never get that respect from the chiefs because
of that attitude. And as I said to that feminist, I love men.
I loved my father and I love my husband. And it's from that training
I was taught that you work with one another. You are your male
partner's helpmate. And when you have that kind of respect for
each other then the other partner doesn't become a footstool.
So that was part of my training.
Continue your journey