|
AMMSA Home Page
AMMSA
Aboriginal Scholarships AMMSA
Festival Showcase On-line
Contest |
|
||||||||
|
|
|||
|
Veterans honored Chinese Canadian and Aboriginal veterans joined forces to open the Chinese Canadian Military Museum in Vancouver on Nov. 7. Pictured are: (from left to right) Duane Terry, Bing C. Wong, Kwagiulth Nation member Judge Alfred Scow and National Aboriginal Veterans Association President Art Eggros. Photo credit: Joy Ward |
Veterans honored
by Paul BarnsleyNisga'a people say "Yes"
by Paul BarnsleyMakah whaling watch continues
Eco-colonialism or environmentalism
by Paul BarnsleyApex of chief's career approaching
by Paul BarnsleyRecovery: The first three years
by Gil LeratLand issues: Who's right?
By Paul BarnsleyNews in brief:
Labor, Summit find common ground
Here is a full list of additional stories featured in the November, 1998 issue of Raven's Eye. If you are not receiving your own copy of Raven's Eye, then you have missed all this information.
Click here for Raven's Eye subscription information.
Shooting leads to independent investigation
First Nation builders elevated and empowered
Therapist says bands keeping youth suicide secret
Committee pulls plug on Fargo; Oklahoma may host
Veteran leader retires
Union ready for action
Premier fighting hard for Nisga'a deal
Native Youth Movement takes a strong stand
Movie bug bites Okanagan Nation communities
Labor, Summit find common ground
Two days of meetings in Nanaimo in late October ended with the renewal of a 12-year-old commitment from organized labor and First Nations leaders to work together.
"First Nations and labor are going to stand together and actively participate in the new economy and business opportunities the Nisga'a and other treaties will bring in the coming years," said British Columbia Federation of Labor President Ken Georgetti.
"The treaty process is our opportunity to shape the future economy of this province," said George Watts of the First Nations Summit. "And if we sit back and pass up this opportunity, we're going to be thrown into the North American race at the bottom. That's not good for Aboriginal people. That's not good for working people."
The parties agreed to work together to fight the growing gap between the rich and poor in the Canadian economy. They also agreed to work more closely in areas such as pressuring governments to embrace the spirit of the Delgamuukw decision and participating in an effective treaty process.
Watts said the parties are committed to promoting fair treaties.
"We will support the Nisga'a in fighting back against the legal action launched by Gordon Campbell and the Liberal Party," he said. "The alternative to the treaty is to stay under the Indian Act, which is unacceptable to the Nisga'a and all First Nations."
Native lawyers to meet"Traditional Laws, Values and Governance" is the theme for the 10th annual Indigenous Bar Association of Canada conference, which will be hosted at the First Nations House of Learning Longhouse at the University of British Columbia on November 12 and 13.
The Indigenous Bar Association is a non-profit professional organization for Indigenous persons who have legal training.
Speakers from all over the world have been invited to address the conference.
The organizers will waive the conference fees for the first 50 Indigenous law students who register.
"The objective is to bring together various members of Indigenous communities to discuss and reflect on our cultural and spiritual values in our respective careers," said IBA director Candice Metallic.
"As Indigenous lawyers and community members are in positions to influence the future of our Nations, we are obliged to be familiar with and appreciate the values which have shaped traditional laws and governance structures."
Summit chiefs laud new guideThe British Columbia Ministry of Education will introduce Shared Learnings: Integrating Aboriginal Content K-10 this month.
The resource guide will help teachers and students learn about the culture, traditions and languages of the Indigenous peoples of the British Columbia area.
Grand Chief Edward John, a First Nations Summit Task Force member, is optimistic that this move by the ministry will have a beneficial impact.
"While we don't know the specifics of what will be included in the new resource guide and teaching modules, it is important to First Nations and all British Columbians to know more about the historic and current relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people in British Columbia," John said. "This new educational material will hopefully balance the misguided efforts of those opposed to the Nisga'a treaty and B.C. treaty process who continue to spread misinformation to the British Columbia public based on the denial of Aboriginal rights and Aboriginal title held by First Nations people in this province today."
By Paul Barnsley
Raven's Eye Writer
VANCOUVER
The National Aboriginal Veterans Association was invited to
participate in the opening of the Chinese Canadian Military Museum
on Nov. 7.
Located in the Chinese Cultural Centre on East Pender St., the
museum will serve in part as a reminder that Chinese Canadians
served in the Canadian military despite the fact that they were
not granted full rights as citizens until after the Second World
War.
Chinese Canadian veterans reached out to Aboriginal veterans
in a show of respect and to indicate that they understood the
depth of the insult that Aboriginal veterans must feel after
being treated in a similar manner, said NAVA member Joy Ward.
Several Aboriginal veterans participated in the ribbon-cutting
ceremony which officially opened the museum. An honor song was
sung during the ceremony.
By Paul Barnsley
Raven's Eye Writer
NEW AIYANSH
Nisga'a
Tribal Council President Joe Gosnell spent Saturday, Nov. 7 in
his office answering calls from reporters in all parts of the
country as Canada and the world turned its attention to the remote
and starkly beautiful Nass Valley and the Nisga'a ratification
vote. At least 60 per cent of the Nisga'a people voted to slip
out from under the Indian Act and embark on an historic journey
into unknown waters.
"The Nisga'a Treaty is a triumph for Canada," Chief
Gosnell said after the results were announced. "It spells
a new relationship between Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal
people in this country. Together, we are writing a new chapter
in Canadian history - and the whole world is watching. Once the
treaty is ratified by all three parties, we will be full participants
in Canadian society. Now let's get it done."
Two days of voting and three long days of counting and verifying ballots brought one stage in a more-than-a-century-long process to a close in the early days of November as the Nisga'a people decided to give their tribal council's final agreement with Canada and British Columbia a chance at life.
Pending a ratification vote in the British Columbia legislature,
which may happen as early as Nov. 26, and then another vote in
House of Commons, the new reality for Nisga'a people is that
life under the Indian Act is about to end, for better or for
worse.
Premier Glen Clark is worried that the approaching free vote
in the provincial legislature or one of the three court challenges
which dispute the legal legitimacy of the agreement may still
kill it, a possibility that Nisga'a Tribal Council President
Joe Gosnell acknowledged.
"Our lawyers made application for us to be added as defendants
in the lawsuits a few days ago," Gosnell told Raven's Eye
a week before the vote. "So far, we've heard nothing."
Gosnell predicted an angry reaction and widespread activism by
Aboriginal people should the agreement be vetoed. Premier Clark
has also said publicly that a move to kill this agreement by
Opposition forces could kill all hope of treaty negotiations
in the province.
Aboriginal leaders in many parts of the country, and especially
in the British Columbia Interior, have condemned the agreement
for giving up too much land and creating the precedent for the
extinguishment of Aboriginal rights. Former Union of British
Columbia Indian Chiefs President, Saul Terry, called the agreement
"state-assisted suicide."
Gosnell reacts angrily to that kind of criticism. He believes
his council took action and accomplished something when other
leaders were stuck in neutral.
"They haven't done a damned thing," he said.
Those who voted in the Nisga'a ratification vote cast two ballots.
In addition to approving the final agreement to accept land,
cash and a limited form of self government, the Nisga'a people
also voted to approve the Nisga'a Constitution. The constitution
has not been made available outside the Nisga'a communities but
Gosnell gave Raven's Eye a few insights into its contents.
"The Nisga'a Constitution is an internal document that will
be the guiding factor after the treaty is ratified," he
said during an interview on Nov. 7. "It will describe how
we'll be governed after we've disposed of the Indian Act. We're
throwing the Indian Act out and in its place we're going to establish
the Nisga'a Constitution."
The tribal council president said the main benefit of the new
constitution will be an improved form of accountability.
"Until now, our councils were more accountable to Treasury
Board and the minister of Indian Affairs than they were to their
own people," he said. "We think that went out with
the dinosaurs and this final agreement and constitution will
break that link with regional office and Ottawa."
Gosnell said there are provisions in the constitution for the
people to recall leaders who they feel aren't doing an adequate
job. His council, he said, has broken the deadlock that exists
in many Aboriginal communities between modern forms of government
and traditional forms of hereditary government.
"We find it hard to believe, bearing the times we're living
in, that east of here there are chiefs for life," he said.
Adding that there is a place for hereditary chiefs and traditional
institutions in his community's future, he said that place will
not be in government.
"From a political standpoint, there's no chiefs for life
in our constitution," he said.
Gosnell believes the control over its own affairs that the final
agreement gives to the Nisga'a Nation will more than balance
out the loss of the protections of the Indian Act and his people
will thrive.
"If we fail, we will have no one else to blame but ourselves,"
he said.
The task of rebuilding a nation in a modern context is the next
step once the agreement is ratified at all levels. It will mean,
in Gosnell's eyes, the creation of something new and modern.
"I don't like this Hollywood version of Indians," he
said.
Results (as of Nov. 11)
Final Agreement
Total ballots cast - 2,029
"Yes" votes - 1,215
Percentage in favor - 60
Ballots yet to be counted - 382
Nisga'a Constitution
Accept - 1,227
Reject - 408
Percentage in favor - 76
Makah whaling
watch continues:
Eco-colonialism or environmentalism
By Paul Barnsley
Raven's Eye Writer
NEAH BAY, Wash.
Descendants of the original inhabitants of the furthest western
regions of the North American continent are locked in a high-profile
cat and mouse game with the international environmental community
as several environmental groups patrol the Juan de Fuca Strait
in an attempt to stop the resurrection of an Indigenous cultural
activity.
It's all about whaling. The reservation community of Neah Bay,
population approximately 15,000 on the American side of the strait
in the state of Washington, has been site of a media watch since
the late days of September. The Makah Tribal Council has done
its legal homework with the state and federal governments and
is within its rights to harvest as many as five grey whales this
year.
October 1 was the day when the whaling could legally begin. Environmentalists
and the international media descended on this town, a 90 minute
ferry ride across the strait from Victoria, in late September.
The environmental groups arrived with the intention of stopping
the whale hunt. The media, of course, were present to cover the
hunt or the environmentalists efforts to stop it. After more
than a month of waiting, there is a strained feeling in the air
around Neah Bay. Violence has broken out on at least one occasion.
The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has been aggressive in
its efforts to scare whales away from the region. Raven's Eye
photographer Heinz Ruckemann has spent a lot of time in the area,
hoping to capture images of the event for our readers. He reports
a Sea Shepherd ship has been discharging loud explosive devices
in an attempt to scare the whales away from the region. Ruckemann
also reports that the community is divided over the issue. He
said one Elder who opposes whaling has been the target of jeers
in the street from young people.
Critics say the Makah leaders are allowing themselves to be used
by whaling companies in Norway and Japan to undermine a 1986
ban on commercial whaling imposed by the International Whaling
Commission. Once the ban on whaling is broken, the commercial
whaling companies will make their own applications to resume
operations by claiming they are also Indigenous peoples with
whaling traditions, the environmentalists claim.
Will Anderson, on board a submarine painted to look like a killer
whale to scare the greys away from the Makah hunters, works as
an advocate for the United States-based animal welfare group,
Progressive Animal Welfare Society (PAWS). He told Raven's Eye
there have been a few minor incidents during the standoff , but
he said the U.S. Coast Guard is keeping a close watch on things.
First Nations on the Canadian side of the border are keeping
a close watch on events to the south. Nuu-chah-nulth people on
the West Coast of Vancouver Island are related to the Makah people
and are also traditional whalers. They attended a potlatch in
Neah Bay this month. Nuu-chah-nulth leaders are also making
plans to revive the whale hunt, saying it's an important part
of their culture.
Francis Frank, co-chair of the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council,
wants the environmental groups to mind their own business.
"We think the protests that are being engineered are just
another form of eco-colonialism, and because of our kinship with
them, any challenge to the rights of the Makah people is a challenge
to the rights of the Nuu-chah-nulth people," he said. "There
is a contradiction in what the environmental groups are doing.
The environmental community in the past has unconditionally supported
our right to negotiate our treaty. Now they are contradicting
themselves by saying neither the Nuu-chah-nulth nor the Makah
should be able to practice our rights. In doing this they are
arguing for the continued oppression of our people."
By Paul Barnsley
Raven's Eye Writer
PENTICTON
Chief Stewart Phillip believes he has been given a crucial
job at a crucial time for his people.
Elected as president of the Union of British Columbia Indian
Chiefs during the organization's 30th annual general meeting
in Vancouver from Oct. 20 to 22, the Penticton Indian Band chief
came away from the gathering with a new job and a renewed feeling
that a turning point in the relationship between Indigenous peoples
and the colonial governments is rapidly approaching.
Phillip said a resolution which the chiefs passed in Vancouver
will be the guiding light during his term as UBCIC president.
In that resolution the chiefs showed they are tired of reacting
to governments and will, in the future, make plans and take action
to force progress in a variety of areas, especially the all-important
land issue.
"The resolution, in essence, was to seize the initiative,"
Phillip told Raven's Eye. "The chiefs are not prepared to
continue to pursue the same old agenda and continue to discuss
the issues ad infinitum. We see what could almost be called a
crusade by the federal and provincial governments to extinguish
our rights and title. Delgamuukw gave us a lot of hope. The chiefs
were jubilant when the decision came out. We really thought we'd
finally see some justice and we've been waiting patiently."
The patience was wearing thin during the UBCIC general meeting.
Many chiefs complained that the governments have spent more time,
energy and expertise finding ways to avoid embracing the spirit
of Delgamuukw than they have in complying with the Supreme Court
of Canada decision. Phillip and many other chiefs see the executive
or political branch of government resisting the rulings of the
courts. The new UBCIC president predicts his organization will
develop a strategy which will incorporate "political action,
legal action and direct action."
The Penticton Indian Band chief is no stranger to direct action.
His community became the focus of national attention when it
stopped the development of the Apex resort several years ago.
Stewart and his wife Joan, a Penticton band councillor, make
it a point to travel to and show support for other First Nations
in the province whenever there is a confrontation.
The chiefs actually got a two-for-one deal when they elected
Phillip. He and Joan, their four children grown and out of the
nest, are full-time political activists who work very closely
together.
"Politics brought us together," he said. "We were
both working at the Vancouver Indian Centre when we met in 1977.
Since then, we've been arrested together and jailed together."
And if the election of the 48-year-old, 22-year political veteran
means interesting times to come for federal and provincial government
officials, Phillip might have at least a little sympathy for
them because he has lived through some very interesting times,
himself. He was apprehended by provincial authorities at the
age of nine months and spent the next 23 years being raised by
a non-Native couple in Quesnel. His birth parents, he said, both
had tuberculosis at the time of his apprehension, and provincial
policy made it impossible for them to contact him. Eventually,
his birth father tracked him down and he was invited to return
to his home community.
"A lot of the children who were apprehended were returning
to Penticton. The community was reaching out to them," he
said. "In fact, I was the last one to return. And I was
just overwhelmed by the love I felt when I went home."
He had a lot of catching up to do when it came to his Indigenous
heritage and the struggle took its toll. But he is now very proud
that he has conquered a problem with the bottle and remained
sober for 11 years. He and Joan both sought treatment (Joan has
been sober for nine years).
Phillip has also faced death at close range. On June 19, 1996
he underwent a liver transplant which effectively cured his liver
cancer. He said he was in great peril when word came down that
he had been accepted as a transplant recipient.
"I've got a bumper sticker in my office that helps me get
through some of the hard times," he said. "It says
'Any day above ground is a good day.' Being that close to death
gives you an incredible respect for the precious gift of life."
Known and respected among his peers as a man who says what he
does and does what he says, Phillip is halfway through a four-year
term as Penticton chief and said his home community is showing
great support for him as he takes on the arduous task of adding
the UBCIC president's duties to his workload. He tried to persuade
Saul Terry, the retiring Union president, to continue. When Terry
made it clear he was retiring, and Phillip was nominated, he
made the decision to stand for election.
"I felt greatly honored to be nominated and then elected
and I feel this is a very critical time in our history,"
he said.
Recovery: The first three years
By Gil Lerat
Raven's Eye Columnist
VANCOUVER
Those who are already in recovery know that it's a life-long
journey of healing and self-development.
One of the greatest myths about seeking sobriety is the belief
that "everything will be OK if only I quit using."
My column this month is going to look at the first three years
of sobriety and why this phase is the most important if we want
to remain clean.
As I have said in past columns, abstinence is the easiest part
of recovery. All we have to do is not "pick up." I'm
sure we have all heard of someone who is on a "dry drunk."
It's reteaching ourselves how to deal with life, emotions and
feelings on a daily basis in a healthy manner that will enable
us to remain clean without the use of alcohol or drugs.
There is a difference between abstinence and recovery. Those
who choose abstinence will undoubtedly relapse. This is not fantasy.
It's a fact.
The reason? You have to learn how to live with yourself when
you're not using.
That is why the first three years are very critical for a person
who is about to journey into healing. This three year theory
applies to those who are in recovery, not abstinence. That is,
people who are continually taking inventory of themselves to
better understand themselves.
Year one basically deals with what we term as physical detoxification
- getting our minds and bodies used to not using. No matter what
dilemma we come across in our first year, as long as we don't
"pick up" we've won.
Depending on what your drug of choice was, the body can actually
physically detoxify at 30, 60, 90 days and 6, 9 and 12 months
after using.
When I was around six months clean, I swore that someone was
using cocaine in the recovery house that I was working in. It
was a real hot day. I was sweating and when I was about to take
a shower, I realized it was me who smelled like cocaine. My body
was still physically detoxifying.
Year two is what we term as mental/emotional detoxification.
The main issue is no longer "not picking up", but dealing
with the new found feelings and emotions. The majority of people
who become chemically dependent used when they were happy, sad,
agitated, etc. We always found a reason to use.
Now that we have entered recovery, we have to see an emotion
through to the end. Believe me, this is very difficult for many
an addict. When we first begin abusing we stunt our emotional
growth.
I was 30 years old when I cleaned up. I became very angry with
myself because I was no more than 15 years old emotionally.
Year three is what we term as the maturation phase.
We begin to feel and deal with emotions and feelings that we
have felt and dealt with before. We can start to analyze what
worked and didn't work the first time around and ask ourselves,
"How can I handle this situation better?"
Remember, using was a way of life. Therefore, not using has to
be a way of life.
There is only one thing that you have to change when entering
recovery . . . everything!
To this day I still remember what my alcohol and drug counsellor
told me when I was at my most agitated stage of recovery.
"It took you 30 years to learn all these dysfunctional behaviors.
What makes you think you can change them in six months?"
It's a tough process, but believe me, it's worth it.
Until next month, may the Creator be with you always.
By Paul Barnsley
Raven's Eye Editor
I spent three days covering the Union of British Columbia
Indian Chiefs 30th annual meeting in Vancouver and then, two
weeks later, was off to the north to get a first hand look at
the Nass Valley and the Nisga'a vote.
The views held by the Union chiefs and those held by Nisga'a
Tribal Council President Joe Gosnell are as widely separated
as any two points of view can be.
But is one right? Is one wrong? It seems that if one group is
right then the other must be wrong. They certainly disagree.
And the two sides certainly weren't shy about criticizing the
other.
On both my trips I met Aboriginal leaders of great ability, passion
and charisma. Chief Saul Terry rightfully earned the respect
and affection of the Union chiefs over his many years as their
president. It was inspiring to see him still unbowed after so
many years of being the outsider, of taking on governments without
softening his resolve to win back the land. In his farewell address,
he repeated his position that compromise isn't the answer when
it comes to the rights of the future generations and land claim
settlements. His successor, Chief Stewart Phillip strikes me
as a deep and strong individual who will not blink when push
comes to shove. He also gives off strong indications that he
will act at the right time in a decisive manner. There are many
people in Victoria who felt their blood pressure rise a bit when
the word got out that Phillip will lead the Union.
Nisga'a leaders and Union chiefs disagree completely on the right
solution to the land question in the province.
The Nisga'a leadership defends their agreement by saying that
compromise is the only way to get things done. Nisga'a Tribal
Council President Joe Gosnell told me that he and his negotiators
fought the government hard on every single word in the agreement
that the Nisga'a people approved in early November. He's under
no illusions that Canada wouldn't have taken it all and left
his people with nothing if they'd been able to do so. He believes,
and feels the favorable vote proves his people believe, that
the Nisga'a agreement was the best his people could do.
Gosnell left Nov. 10 for a speaking tour of Europe, during which
he said he'll tell foreign governments and their diplomatic staff
members that Canada is finally, slowly beginning to get it right
when it comes to dealing with Aboriginal people.
Is that a sign of an unhealthy coziness with a Canadian establishment
that is still perceived by many Aboriginal leaders as the enemy?
Or is it a sign that Joe Gosnell has found the answer for which
his people have been searching for over a century?
It's hard to reconcile the many different threads that make up
the recent history of Canada's relationship with First Nation
leaders in British Columbia and elsewhere across the country.
On the one hand you have Stewart Phillip saying that this is
a moment in time when the federal government is trying to wipe
out Indigenous rights, once and for all. Then you have Joe Gosnell
saying all is progressing as it should. Then you have the First
Nations Summit Task Force chiefs saying they're encouraged by
Premier Glen Clark's defense of the treaty process, the only
way they see to get a square deal from Canada. I guess the only
thing I'm really sure of right now is that it's good that there
are choices for First Nations leaders when they attempt to settle
the land question in the best interests of their communities.
Whether it's a special deal, a seat at the treaty process table
or the hard line of the UBCIC, each individual community can
act as it sees fit to find its own answer.
Ed. note: Carla Robinson, now working for CBC Newsworld, let
us know that while her mom is from Bella Bella, her dad's from
Kitimaat. It seems, after we did our story about her getting
the CBC job and only mentioned Bella Bella, the folks in Kitimaat
think Carla's forgotten about them and that's just not true,
she said.