May - 2007
Disabled INAC employee having troubles
By Paul Barnsley, Windspeaker Staff Writer
HULL, Que.
Josée Guest, the staff Ombudsman for Indian and Northern
Affairs Canada (INAC), first started raising alerts about the
way the department deals with employee disability issues in her
second annual report in 2003.
As the person designated to help employees struggling with disabling
injuries or illnesses-as well as other matters-Guest hears from
many INAC employees. As with any large employer, there are many
points of friction between management and staff.
The staff Ombudsman's office, created at INAC in 1990, is designed
to be an impartial and confidential place where employees can
go for advice-or even just to blow off a little steam-if they're
having difficulty at work.
In her 2003 report to the highest-ranking INAC bureaucrat, the
deputy minister, Guest wrote "persons with disabilities
consulted the staff Ombudsman at a rate higher than their total
representation within the department. The Duty to Accommodate
Policy should be distributed regularly to help managers, supervisors
and staff identify needs."
The fact that employees dealing with disability issues were involved
with Guest at a higher than proportionate rate indicates that
the department is not yet on top of the issue.
Two years later, in her 2005 annual report, the staff Ombudsman
provided a lot more detail about the nature of the problem.
"Many employees find themselves, for reason out of their
control, on long-term disability leave. In order to collect disability
insurance (DI), many forms need to be filled and delivered to
specific responsibility areas at the appropriate time,"
she wrote. "When these time lines are not met it can cause
financial worries, such as paybacks and/or reduced income, to
an employee who is already in a vulnerable position. It can also
cause added stress to an employee returning to work after long-term
disability leave. Return to work full-time can be impeded."
She suggested, at the end of March in 2005, that the department
face the problem head on.
"One possible solution in order to be prepared could be
to dedicate resources who would be assigned to deal with every
aspect of disability leave, from making sure the forms are where
they should be when they are needed to integration back into
their workplace on the employee's return to work," she wrote.
Marianne McLeod, a 33-year-old citizen of the Chippewas of Nawash
First Nation, would agree with all of that. The project officer
with the advocacy and partnerships section of INAC's economic
development branch at headquarters in the Ottawa region has a
condition that causes chronic pain and fatigue that can also
disrupt sleep patterns.
It's a condition that was diagnosed in 1996, three years before
she began employment at INAC in April of 1999.
On Aug. 11, 2004, at the request of her director, she was assessed
by Health Canada.
"I was declared unfit for work and began short-term disability
on the following day, due to fibromyalgia. Short-term turned
into long-term disability. In April of 2005, I was reassessed
and told that I needed four to six more months off," she
said.
She returned to work four months later, putting in four hours
a day, three days a week under the government's Graduated Return
to Work Program.
"Shortly after returning to work I began to have some problems
with my pay," she said.
For the next six months, she was being either paid for more hours
than she worked or found that previous over-payments had been
deducted, leaving her with no money to pay bills.
"During 2005, my pays they went up and down like a roller
coaster from as little as $324 gross to as much as $1,944 gross
at times. It was very stressful and extremely hard to gauge my
finances, as well as the concerns of DI reporting and my T-4
come time for 2005 taxes," she said.
"At the end of 2005, I had been overpaid by the department
for a total of $4,000 gross," she said.
Then in November of 2006, a deadline for filing a routine medical
report was missed and the insurance company cut off her disability
insurance and she was forced to apply to return to work full
time.
Problems persisted, as she became involved in disagreements over
what was legitimate time off and what was not.
In March of this year, McLeod retained a lawyer to look at civil
remedies for what she calls a "very frustrating and stressful
situation."
"And when you consider that stress is a factor that contributes
to my illness, this is just terrible situation," she said.
More Windspeaker Articles
Comments?
TOP