December - 2005
Kashechewan was not news
Editorial
You will notice that the frenzy that was on display in the
national mainstream media in late October and early November
is not echoed in the pages of this publication.
Day after day, front-page stories in large circulation dailies
were followed by "in depth reports" on the national
television news packages: There's a problem with the drinking
water on a remote Indian reserve in northern Ontario and the
government isn't doing anything about it, we were breathlessly
told over and over again. Gee, really?
That might have been news to the residents of the big southern
Canadian cities, but believe us, it was not news to any Aboriginal
person, especially those who have read Windspeaker over the last
dozen or more years.
It was not news to Canada's own commissioner of the environment
and sustainable development, Johanne Gélinas, who pointed
out on Nov. 17 that Indian Affairs' own research revealed years
ago that three-quarters of Indian reserves have concerns about
water quality.
And no, this is not an "I told you so" message. What
we're saying is simply that the mainstream media-not just the
government-needs to do a much better job on Aboriginal issues.
The Kashechewan coverage underlines that point dramatically.
That situation at Kash, as it has become affectionately known,
was allowed to fester for years. Those who had observed the persistent
misery on the reserve had stopped believing that any Canadian
government would take action to deal with the Third World-like
situation to bring it to a resolution. But once the media grabbed
onto the story, things happened, and fast. It was a stirring
reminder of the power of the press.
But when you have the power to do good deeds and you use that
power selectively, what does that say about you? There's two
ways of looking at this. Maybe the news organizations with the
big budgets and the resources required to cover the stories in
the remote communities of this vast land only occasionally stumble
over something that our readership sees as obvious. If that's
not true, then these news organizations have known all along
what's there but only occasionally decide to do anything about
it. The Canadian media look bad either way. Either they're hopelessly
out of touch with the reality of day to day living for more than
one million Canadians or they don't particularly care about those
one million Canadians. Take your pick.
Dear news directors and executive editors: Don't you see that
you are part of the problem? If you don't dig into the workings
of the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs and other departments
that play a role on reserves, the officials will continue to
do the bureaucratic equivalent of sitting on the couch eating
bonbons while people get sick and die.
As long as the mainstream press fiddles with other comparatively
inconsequential matters, our taxpayer-fed bureaucrats will never
have to take the career risk that comes with telling someone
higher up the food chain that they need to spend money to address
the fallout of generations of neglect on reserve.
If you snooze, Indians lose, media folks.
Take it from us, there are enough compelling stories to be told
on the Indian Affairs beat to keep an entire news organization
going full time.
Here's what we usually see in city after city as we travel the
country. The local paper or electronic media outlet is represented
by a junior reporter who is eager to pay his or her dues covering
Indian Affairs and then graduate to a more prestigious (and easier)
beat as quickly as possible. When that happens, the next new
grad starts from scratch all over again. That, as much as anything,
is what allows the government to get away with Kashechewan-type
abuses for years and years and years.
It wouldn't take much to drastically improve the quality of coverage
of Aboriginal issues in the mainstream media. Just a little more
of what Justice Minister Irwin Cotler calls the seven "Rs."
Cotler said the under-representation of Indigenous people as
lawyers or judges in the justice system and the over-representation
of Indigenous people as defendants and convicts can be corrected
through recognition, respect, redress, representation, responsiveness,
reconciliation and relationships.
If government and media actually embraced that strategy, things
would get better in a hurry.
Other Windspeaker Editorials
Comments?
TOP